Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Constellation

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 04:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Constellation

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

I'm nominating this LTA report I've created in the past. I don't think this spam network is big enough to have it's own report, eventhough it spammed many xwikis for some time before gubernatorial elections in Russia and then stopped. I'll let the community decide on what to do with this now unactive LTA case.  A09  | (talk)  16:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment: Assuming no one opposes, you could tag it for speedy deletion under G7 (author requests deletion). Mseingth2133444  ( talk / contribs ) 00:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm having a hard time to just quickly delete it, hence I'm asking the community to see if it's valuable enough to keep.  A09  | (talk)  18:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - Even if there was no need for the LTA report, there is also no need to delete it if it is correct, and its correctness does not seem to be in question. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Inactive, not enough justification to keep (WP:DENY). Can be recreated if comes back at large scale. NotAGenious (talk) 10:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. I strongly disagree with using WP:DENY as a rationale with these, as LTA has their usefulness in terms of helping to identify more potential socks. As this one seems to be inactive, and is not prolific enough for an archive I don't see how it can be useful to anyone anymore. I also want to point out that WP:USEFUL only applies to article content and is not meant to aid editors within Wikipedia for these kind of issues. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.