Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Creative raymark

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:06, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Creative raymark


This is not really a long-term abuse. It's been just 6 months since it started and there is only a handful of accounts discovered.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This looks like a standard sockpuppetry case to me, and Vanjagenije has a lot of experience in sock cases and knows what they're doing. Chickadee46 (talk&#124;contribs) (WP:MCW) 02:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.