Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Cyberpunk2077JohnnySilverhand

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  12:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Cyberpunk2077JohnnySilverhand

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This was nominated for deletion before by Praxidicae, and closed as delete, but then restored at DRV as there was not a clear consensus. I am nominating again, as this is an obvious vandal we should not be giving attention to (per WP:DENY), the page is not particularly helpful in its current form and appears to have become a target for other vandals. --Ferien (talk) 20:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm inclined to agree with some comments from the previous MfD. It's not an informative page, and it's an obvious enough vandal. If we need to reference anything, the Chinese LTA page would probably suffice. And in this case SPI can be used for any other information. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is nothing worth keeping about this page; on top of that, it is becoming a target for other vandals, as the nominator noted. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 01:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per checkuser User:Zzuuzz.
 * MfD should have no authority over SPI and LTA subpages, as it lacks competence. Deletion of these pages should be entirely at the discretion of checkusers and SPI clerks. SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:13, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * , had I not created this MfD, the page would just be sat there, as a vandal playground with no useful info to anyone. If deletion of them should be entirely at the discretion of checkusers and clerks (not even of "normal" admins), creation should be the same - there are quite a few LTA pages out there that do not meet the conditions laid out at Long-term abuse. SPI clerks and checkusers already have quite a lot on their plate, why should we add to that? --Ferien (talk) 21:33, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Because, few participants at MfD have sufficient knowledge experience etc with SPI and LTA. If you want to help in this area, ask at WT:SPI. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete as per Zzuuzz. Ferien writes:  SPI clerks and checkusers already have quite a lot on their plate, why should we add to that?  Yes.  Do not add the responsibility of randomly reviewing at MFD LTA files that are nominated by editors who are uselessly trying to help.  Checkusers and clerks already do all of the useful work on long-term abuse.  We don't need to have random users randomly coming up with their own ideas.  Leave LTA to SPI clerks.  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:40, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Or become an SPI Clerk. SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not an LTA. I, however, disagree with the sentiment that MfD isn't the right place for this. C LYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 06:17, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.