Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/My Royal Young

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. It's snowing in July??? (non-admin closure) C LYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 17:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/My Royal Young

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Per WP:DENY I dont think MRY needs a LTA page Qwv (talk) 15:36, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep—wrong forum, per the MFD instructions on whether to nominate process pages: Established pages and their sub-pages should not be nominated .... Doesn't seem like a recipe for anything good to bring individual LTA pages to MFD. Since the "per WP:DENY" argument could apply to any active LTA page, this is similar to relitigating the merits of LTA as a whole, but this was recently discussed in an RfC, and the consensus was to keep it going.—Alalch E. 16:20, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - even though this page was created by an apparent sock of this individual, I agree with the RfC provided above and there are other LTA equivalent pages still active. And also, this case has a talk page with past discussions inbcluded. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 09:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep This page is useful for keeping track of this user. Partofthemachine (talk) 18:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - The page has already been blanked. At this point nominating the page for deletion is a Streisand effect.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Close. MfD is not for clerking LTA or SPI.  If you want to clerk these things, get qualified. Bringing something to MfD “per DENY” means that you don’t understand WP:DENY. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:03, 23 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Close I am not exactly sure if this is Streisand effect, but the page is already blanked, the LTA might come back, and we need information - for posterity. I would have boldly closed this, but I consider myself as "involved" with that LTA (I have reported many socks). —usernamekiran (talk) 09:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.