Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/UltraUsurper

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ‑Scottywong | [express] || 15:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/UltraUsurper

 * – (View MfD)

This is a weird mix of aspersions (claiming that is a sock puppet) and an apparent ad for some VPN. It is not useful. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Indeed, I do not know why Prahlad balaji was blocked (other than it had something to do with Oversight); however, I do know that he was was not a sock, especially given there has never been an SPI launched into him. This is definitely a WP:CONSPIRACY theory. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 19:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Author has made no edits except to create this, and a CheckUser does not think this is a valid LTA case. We can let the nominator investigate who the author really is.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, noting that the nom is the checkuser involved in the related Sockpuppet investigations/UltraUsurper/Archive. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Useless LTA case that casts WP:ASPERSIONS and gives demonstrably false information (e.g. Prahlad balaji's location). This is not something that should be kept.  Java Hurricane  04:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.