Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/VHS vandal

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/VHS vandal


I don't think there is a "long-term abuse" here. Sockpuppetry was discovered just few months ago, and only a handful of socks were detected.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:08, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. IPv6-hopping vandalism to these articles was common until the range was blocked. After that, he started creating accounts. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 16:09, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, he recently went too far with a gun shooting hoax involving a fictional character called "Tashianna Jenkins" (he targeted Pennsylvania-related articles with that, but not video format articles for some reason). KATMAKROFAN (talk) 18:11, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


 * I think checkusers and their clerks should have complete discretion over these records, whether to keep, archive, or delete. In the absence of checkuser and checkuser clerk comment, this page should not be deleted.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't follow you. Since I am a WP:SPI Clerk, does my !vote counts?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If course. Did you make the nomination as an SPI Clerk? I didn't notice your badge. Sometimes random people nominate random things. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.