Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Velenje vandal

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 22:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Velenje vandal

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This user was active from February 2014 to April 2015. That is not "long-term".  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Move to archive per Category:Wikipedia long-term abuse – Archived, and blank if necessary. I'm not sure why an archive exists here, but it's a viable option to retain the records. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination by SPI clerk. It is best to leave long-term abuse reports to the management of SPI clerks, and if an SPI clerk says that the LTA file should not have been created, follow their lead.  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:31, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is the case then there should be some criteria for the archive. Otherwise, why have it at all? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:08, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * User:Knowledgekid87 I agree. I think that there should be guidelines that mostly leave long-term abuse to the SPI clerks.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Archive and blank per Knowledgekid87. #prodraxis connect 17:44, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Robert McClenon.—Alalch E. 00:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Very weak delete: Never an LTA. Archival is for former LTAs who have stopped. C LYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 03:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and do not archive. I believe this case goes back to 2010 or so, but it's outside the scope of LTA. The report has always been a bit inconsistent, and it's not really useful even in a historical context. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.