Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long term abuse/General Tojo 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Shalom Hello 14:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Long term abuse/General Tojo
This guy hasn't been active for quite some time apparently. Do we really need this?  Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake)  21:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * This guy comes back every few months. Things started in June 2006, and in July 2007 I was still blocking sockpuppets. Keep for reference. I have no illusions about this miscreant rearing his ugly head again. JFW | T@lk  20:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't see any valid reason to delete it. Acalamari 21:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per JFW if vandal's still active. Resurgent insurgent 03:28, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Personal belief of lack of activity doesn't seem to be reason to delete the page. -- Jreferee  (Talk) 06:02, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep for reference and because he may yet come back, and not having that page to reference would definitely hinder attempts to block sockpuppets. Ne ra n e i   (talk) 02:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - records of this sort are conventionally preserved for the long term. I don't see why we should delete this - the information might be needed at some point, even if the chance isn't particularly high. — xDanielx T/C 04:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.