Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Komodo lover


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Never mind  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 18:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Long term abuse/Komodo lover
No activity from this vandal since July '08 at the least. Doesn't seem to warrant a subpage anymore. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 21:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. no reason to remove Wikipedia's memory of this case. --Alvestrand (talk) 21:38, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Vandal is still active, just that the person who watches them hasn't been since that date. Still no reason in my mind to delete the subpage though. treelo  radda  22:00, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep One year does not equal permanent absence as many of us know. Collect (talk) 10:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.