Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Master Editor Level Four

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  userfy. To User:Sm8900/Wikipedia service award thumbnails/Master Editor Level Four. There is some consensus that the given page, Master Editor Level Four, represents an unnecessary duplication of the Service awards page. One editor viewed the whole issue more or less moot, much like the service awards more broadly, as "silliness," but, like the creator of the subject page, didn't see a compelling reason to keep or delete it. The nominator didn't expressly ask for deletion, stating only that it was a duplication. Likewise, concurred with the nominator's assessment that it represented unnecessary duplication requiring some extra attention and/or maintenance, and recommended either deletion or redirection. The creator,, acknowledging the duplication, provided a conceivable rationale for its creation being that the image of the service award did not show up in navigation popups when mousing over the wikilink, which no one refuted. Since the creator,, pleaded for it to kept, promising to "take it for walks regularly," and since no one expressly argued for, or made strong cases for deletion, it seemed somewhat bureaucratic, which Wikipedia is notionally not, to redirect it somewhere and have the creator copy & paste the content into their userspace. Thus, userification is the result. (non-admin closure) Doug Mehus T · C  00:18, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Master Editor Level Four

 * – (View MfD)

This page is an unnecessary duplication of what's already covered by the page Service awards. —⁠andrybak (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Neutral - No reason given to delete, but no reason given to keep, especially since most of the service awards are silly. (Maybe the silliness is the reason.) Robert McClenon (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. well has a point; I respect their integrity and their fairness in commenting here, but remaining neutral. my reasoning for creating this item is simple; by creating a page for this service award, it enables anyone to link to this page; if you move your cursor over the link, the navigation popup displays the award emblem, and also displays the criteria for anyone who holds this service award. here is an example, just to illustrate: Master Editor Level Four. so can we keep it?? please?? I promise to take it for walks regularly.  --Sm8900 (talk) 04:19, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to Service awards as this just duplicates the entry in that list. No reason to have a separate page.  Hut 8.5  13:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.