Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Mathews Taapopi Hamutenya

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:43, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Mathews Taapopi Hamutenya


This doesn't belong in Wikipedia (administration) namespace. This could be moved to mainspace or (back to) Draft namespace (without leaving a redirect), but there is a copy at User:Kondjeni Haufiku/sandbox (which has been declined at AFC). This may be CSDable. Could also salt as there's no reason to have a Wp namespace page with this name. DexDor(talk) 17:56, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - The editor who created this article has a sandbox version of the article. S/He can work on the sandbox for developng the article. -- Whpq (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing to suggest currently keeping this. SwisterTwister   talk  22:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Move back to draft space and redirect to sandbox because this version was created in 2012 and the sandbox version in 2015. We generally redirect copies, rather than delete them. 103.6.159.86 (talk) 08:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * It seems the original editor user:Kondjeni Haufiku 200408259 has likely forgotten their password and created account User:Kondjeni Haufiku, and is now editing a draft of the article at User:Kondjeni Haufiku/sandbox. I'd argue that neither the version in the Wikipedia name space, nor the sandbox article at the older account are needed given that the editor is working on a third draft. -- Whpq (talk) 15:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure, given the "it's perfect" edit summary on the page move, that the creator mistakenly conflated mainspace with projectspace, and moved it to this title because they thought that's where finished articles go. That's not a common mistake, but it's not an unprecedented one either — I've seen pages created in or moved into the Wikipedia namespace by inexperienced editors who thought that was mainspace at least fifteen or twenty times before. So I'm going to evaluate it by articlespace standards. By that test, it's not "perfect"; it cites no reliable source coverage, has quite a bit of POV promospeak language threaded through it ("seasoned entrepreneur and a focused visionary leader"), and is written more like a prosified version of a résumé than like an actual encyclopedia article. So even as a misplaced article, moving it into articlespace wouldn't be the answer here — and since the user has a duplicate copy in his own sandbox already, moving it back into draftspace isn't necessary either as there's no need for two draft copies to exist simultaneously. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 16:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.