Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (2nd nomination) (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy Keep The xfdfdfdfdfd's are on 2015-04-01 listing already. — xaosflux  Talk 01:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (2nd nomination)


Potentially disruptive April Fools joke. Didn't tag with G3 because it was created almost 3 years ago. TL22 (talk) 12:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep- We can speedy close an XfD discussion if the nomination is a joke, or trolling, or blatantly wrong-headed, but that does not mean we should delete the discussion. Reyk  YO!  10:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep No argument made to delete the discussion, only to speedily close it, which as the nominator says, happened almost three years ago. Smartyllama (talk) 22:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Getting started on April Fool's Day a bit early this year? --B (talk) 22:52, 31 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.