Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   NAC, wrong forum, discuss inactivation on WT:MFD instead to inactivate

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion
Page seems to exist for the purpose of deleting itself, according to the instructions -- Simply south (talk) 23:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete because I'm a mad deletionist and Simply south beat me to this joke. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Commons as they don't seem to have enough to do over there. Nanonic (talk) 01:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge into Mergers for Discussion and delete via MFD.

Wait... what? –Drilnoth (T • C) 02:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete because TenPoundHammer is a mad deletionist. – Juliancolton  | Talk 02:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It wasnt really a process that anyone paid any attention to anyway. DGG (talk) 02:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Am modifying the debate for no good reason, even though it was blue-backgrounded and archived. In other words, neener neener. &mdash;  Rickyrab | Talk 05:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.