Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Unpatrolled articles/July 2011

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) SD0001 (talk) 10:49, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Unpatrolled articles/July 2011


Nothing special in this outdated page. There is no point keeping this at all. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:57, 10 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, was once useful, is harmless. And there are a lot more where that came from. Graham 87 12:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Please tell me why this was useful. There is nothing in that page which says that it is useful. I don't get what you are saying. The other pages like New pages patrol/Unpatrolled articles/August 2011 has some data but this page has nothing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:12, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, just looked at the history; there were no unpatrolled articles. But that does not mean there was no data ... the fact that there were zero unpatrolled articles a day *is* data that was useful in July 2011 and might be useful now. Why make it so that non-admins such as yourself can't access this data? Graham 87 13:37, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * There is not much use by knowing that there were zero unpatrolled articles in July 2011. Also, maintenance categories are deleted when they are empty so if I were to look for Category:EngvarO from July 2017 as an example, it wouldn't exist because it is deleted as it has been emptied and there are zero entries. So, by deleting Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Unpatrolled articles/July 2011, I would still know there was no data so that it why it got deleted. Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's historical. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as part of New pages patrol/Unpatrolled articles - Agreed it's empty but it may of been a part of something back in 2011, We should preserve history not delete it. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:21, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete once a maintenance task is complete we can move on. This is an old page no one really needs. Legacypac (talk) 19:34, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Graham87 and Davey2010. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 23:39, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.