Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was closing early as keep, as the consensus of many editors is evident already. Tito xd (?!?) 06:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
Well, since nobody, anywhere is willing/able to explain what exactly he or she finds so bloody fuck amusing about this page, I'm assuming it's some kind of a bluff. If it's alleged purpose is that of a canned retort similar to Godwin's law, well, the average talk-page junkie spouts enough non sequiturs without the help of this sad tripe. Even if that was the case, why doesn't somebody just say so? Why the stupid underpants-gnomes air of mystery? Delete and ban creator. — freak([ talk]) 11:07, Oct. 25, 2006 (UTC)
 * Speaking as the creator, feel free to ask ArbCom to ban me. I could use the additional free time. Guy 11:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment previous discussion closed as Keep on July 4 2006. Slambo (Speak) 11:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep a little sillyness helps to break up the seriousness. This particular sillyness has a message, "don't take things too seriously" and back away from a given conflict as necessary. (→ Netscott ) 11:38, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep because I haven't done it yet. -- Ned Scott 11:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spiderman. It's a good essay to lighten up the mood of people making things too complicated!--Konst.ableTalk 13:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment just for the record... if someone really does do this they don't get banned, right? :) -- Ned Scott 13:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as a harmless, humorous exegesis on WP:BEANS; censure the nominator for his wild-eyed uncivil write-up; and ban Guy for 23 nanoseconds for tormenting the humor-impared. ➥the Epopt 13:46, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or move to userspace. Has no point, isn't funny, troll magnet. --Improv 14:46, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Can you show me how this is a troll magnet? 1ne 21:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, perfectly fine. &mdash;  Da rk Sh ik ar i   talk /contribs  18:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep because its funny and some of us are strange enough to try this sort of thing if it isn't specifically prohibited; me, for example. B2T2 21:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't really find it that funny, but I do find it accurate, which, IMHO, is more important. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 21:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and move to Category:Wikipedia Humor. It's just a funny extension of WP:BEANS.--Grand Slam 7 22:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Pointless garbage. --Bob 23:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. A humorous way of restating WP:COOL, just as Assume bad faith is a restatement of WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF, and WP:STUPID is a restatement of countless deletion debates that had only one keep vote. Thanks, Luc "Somethingorother" French 01:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - its a humorous way of pointing out when someone's going too far, or on the verge of doing so. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 01:42, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Another way of saying "Don't take yourself so seriously." --ESP 03:38, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Improv, matureness costs people adminship but yet theses type of pages exist (start of arguement) -- Coasttocoast 03:40, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, speedily if appropriate. As the previous attempt to delete this shows, the page has a lot of support. It is an attempt to lighten what can often become tense dispute situations, and performs its task admirably in that. Just because we're trying to create an encyclopedia doesn't mean we've had humourectomies. Grutness...wha?  05:20, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep In addition to some of the other extensions noted above, I think it's a great restatement of WP:POINT. And it's a clever way to discourage editors from making a "frightful exhibition" of themselves. Rx StrangeLove 06:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strongest Keep - it's very funny (to my taste at least) yet makes a serious point; I've cited it several times. I will add that the nominator's tone and his suggestion of banning the page-creator (who is a highly regarded sysop) are objectionable. Newyorkbrad 13:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep sorry JzG, no ban today. Guess you're stuck here ^_^ Danny Lilithborne 01:39, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep-It's funny, but states the rule so that we can understand it. --Releeshan 02:29, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I've had it with these motherfucking delete votes on this motherfucking plane!. Yes, Keep. -- Chris   chat   edits   essays    04:29, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per ESP, Grutness, and others. 1ne 07:46, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, you probably just don't like Spiderman. :P Seriously though, it's pretty funny. oTHErONE (Contribs) 07:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, per it being fucking hilarious. Rogue 9 10:38, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - There's nothing wrong with a little humor on Wikipedia, and this is a good place for it. This has probably cooled more people down than many essays. —Cswrye 14:06, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and send out a red alert for Freak's sense of humor, its gone missing. Maybe its on top of the Reichstag? Ok, 'fess up, who left it there? KillerChihuahua?!? 23:06, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per WP:SNOW —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kenb215 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 28 October 2006.
 * Keep, per a somewhat reversed notion of WP:SNOW... this article doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of being deleted.  Doc Sigma  (wait, what?)  01:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.