Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Non-local images

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was mark historical. BencherliteTalk 13:34, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Non-local images


Delete. I think this page is now redundant. I think it is for images that are an ext link. If that is the case it is redundant. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Mark as historical – This page is [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Non-local_images&oldid=402518 really, really old]] and harks back to the days when the upload facility didn't exist and all images were loaded from external websites (or, IIRC, they could have been uploaded to the Wikipedia server). These images needed to be uploaded into the database proper, and and the "Non-local images" page helped organise that work. Graham 87 15:22, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Deleting a ten-year-old page is a very bad idea for someone wanting to study our history, and it's not hurting anything.  Perhaps we could move it to the historical archive mentioned hkkere, but please don't get rid of this page history.  Nyttend (talk) 06:52, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep And mark as historical. per the above comments.  DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete or move to Historical archive per Nyttend if this is a genuine bit of history. -- Klein zach  05:41, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.