Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Notability (sports)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn). Joe 17:05, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Notability (sports)
Proposed policy that is overly broad, lacks consensus, and has become dormant. Kinston eagle 15:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * You have convinced me of the wisdom of keeping the page as an archive. Kinston eagle 17:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 *  Speedy keep  The page has been deemed rejected which is consistent with practice at WP.  Typically we keep the proposal with a rejected tag so that future proponents can see that the process has been tried and failed.  --Kevin Murray 15:55, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per Kevin Murray. Lots of time went into these discussions. I'd hate for it to all vanish into the ether just cause it was rejected. Spanneraol 16:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep It would be inconsistent with prior practice to delete this proposal. UnitedStatesian 16:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.