Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Noticeboard proliferation noticeboard

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. Izno (talk) 21:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Noticeboard proliferation noticeboard

 * – (View MfD)

Not useful 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 10:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. We have a lot of pages that are not useful, but exist for more lighthearted purposes. Of course this is not a real noticeboard (if it were, it would be a useless noticeboard), it's a humour page. Mark it as an essay and (if you must) with a humour template such as and it'll be fine. Bishonen &#124; tålk 11:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC).
 * Keep per Bishonen. I have added the humor tag. Jehochman Talk 14:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I respect the fact that our servers only have finite memory and that it would be useful to recover the 3k used to store the page. We should limit the present discussion to no more than 3k otherwise there will be a net loss of memory, even if the page is deleted.  So please, don't leave any longwinded comments, and don't post any not-votes unless you feel very strongly about it. Jehochman Talk 14:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * We're already at 1.5k. Jehochman Talk 14:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Dang it, now 1.7k. Jehochman Talk 14:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * That's terrible. And suppose Bishzilla were to comment, with her heavy tread? Five words from her would pretty much use a megabyte. [Attempting to restrain the monster. Down, Bishzilla!] Bishonen &#124; tålk 16:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC).
 * Delete or Userfy. This looks like opinion pieces between 3 editors discussing things that date to almost 10 years ago. I can see this being funny if it was an inside joke at the time which is why I wouldn't oppose someone adding it as a userpage. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep and perhaps mark more clearly as humor. No objection to potentially marking it historical as well. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 07:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep reasonably amusing. More important, a valid way of using sarcasm to make a point about Wikipedia. No particular reason to delete has been mentioned. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep and tag with a humor tag, per Bishonen --DannyS712 (talk) 01:12, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:NOTUSEFUL is not a useful reason for deletion. – SD0001  (talk) 08:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Move this discussion to a new noticeboard Keep with a Humor or Humorous essay tag, per Bishonen. — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 13:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.