Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Ontology




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. The author has edited since being notified of this discussion, but has not commented. JohnCD (talk) 09:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Ontology
Bizarre "essay" that surely doesn't belong in the project namespace – at the very least. I recommend deletion per the lack of a discernable purpose, and because, other than a bot edit, this hasn't been changed since June 3, 2008, even though it's described as a "work in progress." A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 06:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Ask the author,, and suggest he tag it with db-author. I notified Chendy with Template:MFDWarning, which the nominator ought to have done.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per the silent consent of the author. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete If the author wishes to tag it as SmokeyJoe suggests then that is fine. Since they have been notified of this discussion they can easily do so if they wish to. However, whether the author wishes to have it deleted or not, A Stop at Willoughby is quite right: this does not belong here and should be deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Abandoned since forever, not a good idea in any case. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 13:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.