Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Ownership alerts




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete per WP:SNOW. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 21:20, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Ownership alerts
Redundant noticeboard, apparently someone is making a point. Guy (Help!) 11:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Of no use. Also, you may want to include the following:
 * — Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 11:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete All WP:POINT applies if one simply looks at editor history and his propensity for using WP:OWN as an argument on all Judaic related articles.  See the lengthy and unanimous discussion ay RFC/U on that editor.  Might WP at some point seek added boards? Yep. Is this the way for him to start them? Nope.  Collect (talk) 12:47, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not needed. Someone wants to own ownership-issues. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 13:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all. An AGF noticeboard and an indiscriminate information noticeboard would be a lot more useful than this but still not worth the trouble. Hans Adler 21:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all Per Collect. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:12, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all These don't seem necessary at all Nick-D (talk) 23:17, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all I support George W. Bush's ownership society and this runs contrary to my interests It is not a good idea for a noticeboard. There are more centralized noticeboards we can use. harej  03:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. &lt;&gt;Multi‑Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 06:00, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all. I agree with Collect about the evident pointedness of the creation. Maybe at some point there will be consensus that there is demonstrated need for such a board, but currently there's not. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all per above.  fetch  comms  ☛ 21:45, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all If ownership of articles becomes a huge issue, then use WP:ANI.  N ERDY S CIENCE D UDE  (✉ message • changes) 13:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all This takes forum shopping to a new levelMzk1 (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * Delete all. An AGF noticeboard and an indiscriminate information noticeboard would be a lot more useful than this but still not worth the trouble. Hans Adler 21:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all Per Collect. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:12, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all These don't seem necessary at all Nick-D (talk) 23:17, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all I support George W. Bush's ownership society and this runs contrary to my interests It is not a good idea for a noticeboard. There are more centralized noticeboards we can use. harej  03:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. &lt;&gt;Multi‑Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 06:00, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all. I agree with Collect about the evident pointedness of the creation. Maybe at some point there will be consensus that there is demonstrated need for such a board, but currently there's not. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all per above.  fetch  comms  ☛ 21:45, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all If ownership of articles becomes a huge issue, then use WP:ANI.  N ERDY S CIENCE D UDE  (✉ message • changes) 13:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all This takes forum shopping to a new levelMzk1 (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.