Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Page protection patrol (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete both page and userbox Tikiwont (talk) 14:47, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Page protection patrol

 * — Related userbox. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:12, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Was a project started by Aldrich Hanssen, who has since been banned. I joined him initially but I have removed myself. Thus, the only member of it is a banned user and thus will stagnate. mboverload @ 11:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. This should be speedy closed and a new one started. You've overwritten the last MfD which closed as no consensus seen here by diff.  Syn  ergy 11:27, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I believe I've fixed the error. - jc37 12:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Why was he banned? If he is later unbanned, he should be allowed to have this undeleted.  As he is banned (presumed indefinately), and the only other contributor wants it deleted, and it doen't affect anything else, then let then delete.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:40, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment He was blocked, not banned, for attacks. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Inactive project by an indef blocked user. Also delete the userbox. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Userfy, as historical record/mothballed project. Also, the fact that after the early votes, this was consolidated with the discussion on the userbox, could generate a bit of confusion. EVCM (talk) 16:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think he's been banned in the delete-all-his-edits sense, so that's a non-issue here. I support deletion, however, for the same reasons I did in the first MfD. Which I note is not linked here. seresin ( ¡? ) 18:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete a project with no unblocked members that never really got off the ground. Also per statement by Tiptoety made in last MFd (see link). - Icewedge (talk) 18:57, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I did nom it the first time.  MBisanz  talk 01:42, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per last time. (handy link) – Steel 02:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per the fact that the project has no active members (and never really took off the ground) and my rationale in the first MfD: "Except in special cases (e.g. ArbCom decisions, BLP controversies), a request for unprotection can be made by any user, to any administrator, at any venue known to be watched by at least one administrator (administrator's talk page, article talk page, WikiProject talk page, WP:RFPP, WP:AN, WP:AN/I). There is no reason to over-complicate matters by extensively discussing protections and unprotections or by forming a WikiProject dedicated to this." –Black Falcon (Talk) 20:20, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I think it's still missing other than as a diff, the earlier discussion is at Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Page_protection_patrol. Userfication to an indef blocked user's page makes no sense at all.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 23:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.