Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Party

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Userfy. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Party

 * — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 15:23, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 15:23, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Unlinked from anywhere, and I don't understand the purpose of this page aside from a humor page. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 12:40, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are not enough parties around here, and some are needed to improve the back room ambience.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:38, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Happier with userfy per Godsy. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:54, 6 October 2016 (UTC). An OK sort of idea that didn't fly.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:23, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, completely pointless even as a humor page, not linked from anywhere, no foreseeable use. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Ten Pound Hammer and out of project scope (WP:5P1). -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:5P1 should not be read in isolation of WP:5P4. And that is why excessive shortcuts are counter-productive.  The encyclopedia could exist without editors. More explanation is at Editors matter.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:27, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I believe you meant to say "could not exist without editors" . —  Godsy (TALK CONT ) 07:00, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Userfy to User:The Infobox Strikes Again!/Party, a subpage within the userspace of the user who created this page. They have been active as recently as this September. While the content isn't particularly developed or useful at this time, it doesn't contain any problems. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 07:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 15:23, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Userfy per Godsy.  bibliomaniac 1  5  05:07, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.