Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Peer review/Keith Olbermann/archive1

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 01:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Peer review/Keith Olbermann/archive1


This "peer review" appears mostly to be a spat from 5 years ago. Other than one comment from an uninvolved editor, there is nothing constructive here -- just one editor attacking another in unsigned comments. / /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 08:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep – Two users took their dispute to the wrong venue, but apart from that ... what's so objectionable about it? Some peer reviews have no comments at all. I just can't think of a compelling reason to hide this peer review so it can only be seen by admins, which is all that deletion would achieve. Graham 87 07:29, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Is there any content therein that qualifies it as a "peer review", or is it a peer review simply by the name alone? //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 04:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Homestarmy's comment probably qualifies, just. Graham 87 07:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I respect your opinion, but I think that a single sentence amidst the entirety of the rest detracts from the legitimacy of the peer review concept. IMHO, the entire exchange just makes Wikipedia look petty.  I submit that the value of the one constructive comment doesn't outweigh the negativity of the rest of the "peer review" (though others here may agree that it legitimizes the PR).  Not a big deal either way I suppose (as it's more than half a decade old).  Thanks!  //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 20:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.