Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Profanity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was early closure. Do not list official policy pages for deletion - see first item here. Dan100 (Talk) 11:08, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Profanity
This page directly conflicts with WP:NOT censored for minors. Instead of ignoring it like most people seem to do with policies lately, we might as well get rid of it altogether. karmafist 03:49, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors nor should it ever be. Jtkiefer T  06:22, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep; this isn't censorship, it's editorial taste and judgment. &mdash;Kirill Lokshin 06:57, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I agree with Kirill Lokshin completely. &laquo; Lord  ViD  &raquo; 09:48, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This helps keep me for inserting inappropriate langauge into the article of every Republican politician; good reminder. ;) However, we should all be careful the policy is never overstated: a picture of autofellatio belongs in autofellatio, for goodness' sake. Xoloz 17:49, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, we need a guidelines on profanity just like other editorial stuff. If you don't like what it says, rewrite it.  JYolkowski // talk 18:45, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a reasonable policy since it allows the use of profanity where it would be appropriate to include it; see Harry Frankfurt for an example where it is appropriate, and this edit for an example where it was not. Note, however, that this is policy (not just a guideline now), and any changes to it should reflect consensus. --Metropolitan90 19:37, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, if only for historical interest (since I don't agree with it). Bad 'policies' shouldn't be deleted, they should be discussed. - ulayiti (talk)  01:00, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - I must be dumb; I'm not seeing the conflict with WP:NOT censored for minors. It's common sense. If you can avoid offending sensitive people and not lose information, don't offend sensitive people. &mdash;Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:38, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep -This is currently listed as a policy, but even it it was listed as a guidline, changes or decomisioning should be discussed on it's Talk Page, or perhaps on WP:VPP, not backdoor'ed via MFD. xaosflux  Talk  / CVU  05:33, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Like it or not, it's currently listed as official policy, so it shouldn't be deleted through this process; it can be discussed regarding amending or repealing it as a policy in its own talk page. *Dan T.* 05:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Policies get changed with discussion, not deletion, and see Kirill Lokshin's comment for my take on the censorship issue. Also note that the're are numerous time when profanity is appropriate- discussing the "shit" scene in Transformers: The Movie, or the contents of Resevoir Dogs, The Big Lebowski, or Scarface, but the majority of encyclopediac language is not profane.--Sean|Bla ck  05:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think this is a good guideline for how to deal with articles that are about profane terms and also about quoting stuff that use profanity. Of course, some will not like it, but remember, what is profane to you might not be profane to me and vice verse. Zach (Smack Back) 08:14, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Kirill Lokshin and stop using MFD to disagree with policies. Discussion, not deletion, is how policy changes here. -GTBacchus(talk) 16:27, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this is the internet. People will be able to see far worse things than the f-word. KI 16:34, 26 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.