Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Publications collaboration


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was. delete Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 23:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Publications collaboration
A collaboration started by a single user that never went anywhere. We don't normally list every publication by an individual in their respective article, anyway. There were a few edits made to this page over the span of a few months to fix spelling errors, and then it was tagged historical. There doesn't exist much relevant discussion linking to it, either, except for an odd template unused on any article talk pages that I've also nominated for deletion at TfD. -- RG2 03:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It is tagged as historical as you say. Leave it that way. You have given no reason to delete it. Keep. --Bduke (talk) 04:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I saw that people wanted to delete Miscellany for deletion/WPSing, which is pretty much the same thing -- a project that was begun by a single user, only used by a single user, and then abandoned before it went anywhere. But if we keep pretty much everything, then OK, I guess. -- RG2 04:12, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as is. Tagging inactive is sufficient. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 16:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I really don't see any content that needs to be preserved or that couldn't be easily recreated. Black Falcon (Talk) 04:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.