Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Quadrilliоn pool


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete per MfD precedent on the billion pool. I'm going to interpret all rules here. Precedent must be allowed to govern in these number cases, or we could end up with an infinite number of MfDs, one for every value of "Large Number X" Pool. Hence speedy close to this and any future absurdly-large number pool I see. Xoloz 14:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Quadrilliоn pool
Even more pointless than Trilliоn pool. We're never going to have a quadrillion articles either. Delete. – Gurch 07:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, very very pointless, looks like it's not going to happen in history, maybe 100 years from now. --Ter e nce Ong (T 07:54, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The "o" in Quadrillion is a foriegn character, as well as the fact that a vandal (perhaps a Science3456 impsotr) will make a vote in it early. Moreover, "quadrillion" is an ambiguous word meaning either 10^15 or 10^24. If the consensus ends up as "keep", I vote to rename this pool 10^15 pool. Georgia guy 18:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I suspect that this page was created in response to this decision and was an attempt to make a POINT.  The redirect which existed prior to the current version seemed pointless (and incorrect).  I can not recommend a reversion to that redirect.  Rossami (talk) 03:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like something that would be better suited to Wikicities Future. Well Drawn    Charli  e  09:09, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.