Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Quality articles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was  Tag as historical. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:31, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality articles
Horribly out of date, rarely updated. Redundant with the current WP:FA and WP:GA. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 00:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Textbook case for historical. Anyone mind if I just tag the thing and replace the content with a note saying to look at WP:FA and WP:GA? --erachima talk 00:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * That would be fine with me. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk  ) 00:43, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Tag as historical. Possibly worth blanking if out of date. D.M.N. (talk) 07:30, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I've marked it historical, noted the replacements, and blanked the giant list. Unless someone has an issue with the wording I used in the note, I think this discussion is about finished. --erachima talk 07:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Leave it tagged as historical. I've also removed the link to it from WP:GA.  --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 12:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Leave it as historical. Bart133 t c @ How's my driving? 00:27, 1 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Tag as historical - As already done. -- Lord   ₪   Sunday   14:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)


 * It's History Already done, someone should close this. Mm40 (talk | contribs) 15:45, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.