Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Quite decent articles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 23:04, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Quite decent articles
A list of two articles that are 'quite decent', as in pretty good but not up to FAC level. I fail to see the point. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 10:42, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Useless; inactive. Xoloz 18:15, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Flcelloguy ( A note? ) 00:39, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless we also create a Candidates for Quite decent article status. —Cleared as filed. 17:50, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. CG 18:11, 12 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.