Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Really Reformed Church of Wikipedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  15:05, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Really Reformed Church of Wikipedia
I do realize this is just a joke, not meant to be taken seriously, or to cause offense. But it may cause needless offense to people with strong religious views, and there is no benefit to it. Making innocent fun of Wiki Foundation members, in the way this does, is legit, but its not ok to make fun or parody deeply held religious views, at least in project space. Rob 22:05, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Sacrelige! How dare ye try to break Wikipedia's religion? -- D -Day 22:12, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I personally don't see that it as a problem or offensive, but then I am not relgious, so I'd vote keep on that basis, but I thought things like this belonged on meta so transwiki. Thryduulf 22:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Transwiki to meta.  Tvaughn05 e   (Talk)  (Contribs) 22:43, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * According to its edit history it came from meta, so there's no reason for a duplicate here. I don't want it to exist in meta either, but apparently it already is, so that's a moot point.  --Rob 22:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Dwain 23:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and archive in BJAODN. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-02-08 23:22Z 
 * Delete OK I laughed, but this belongs on Uncylcopedia, not here. Marskell 13:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Pointless content, redundant with its meta copy. Xoloz 18:13, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete but leave a redirect to the meta page rather than nothing. ++Lar: t/c 19:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - We've already been through this once with Essjay's CCoW, please see archives. No need to rehash an old debate. --Dragon695 04:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete 100% Pointless. --Bky1701 08:04, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Delete this useless page! --Davpronk 08:06, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I created the original on meta, and I don't see the need for it to be here. Johnleemk | Talk 15:02, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Str1977 15:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and soft redirect to meta Sam Korn (smoddy) 16:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. AnnH (talk) 21:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 19:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.