Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Reference desk archive/2005 questions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 23:01, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Reference desk archive/2005 questions
A useless list of questions that have been asked with no links or precise location of answers. CG 22:52, 12 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete Essentially useless. Xoloz 02:45, 13 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Um... that's the point of the list. Reference desk archive, to which it is an index, is a link to a set of pages; it saves the searcher having to load first the Jan-Feb page, then the Mar-Apr one, and so forth, to find one question they know was asked in 2005. Keep; no useful reason to delete it, since people do go looking in the archives for questions they know were asked. Shimgray | talk | 17:51, 14 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep of course. --hydnjo talk 18:23, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. --R.Koot 12:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. --HappyCamper 01:21, 17 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.