Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Header




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  No consensus - This has been sitting without action for weeks, relisting didn't do much to improve the situation, last comment was nearly three weeks ago, the header is part of an archive of discussion at WT:RS and a redirect, particularly to the essay Attribution as suggested, does not make much sense and would mess up the archive. The matter is fully documented in the WT:RS archives and at the top of Wikipedia talk:Attribution. Deletion is neither warranted nor supported by consensus. I am taking independent action apart from this closure to remove the cats and mark the page as itself an archive. If anyone thinks it would be more appropriate to copy the template, which is already substituted, into the archive and G6 the /Header, go for it. I am intentionally not adding an old mfd to the talk page as doing so would add nothing and merely create a page. If someone thinks it's really necessary, do it.Doug.(talk • contribs) 19:24, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Reliable sources/Header
Not in use any more. Was created per discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources/archive12, but has no function any more. Except for adding itself and that other page I linked to above to Category:Items to be merged. Sigh. Debresser (talk) 02:51, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 20:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect to Attribution, keeping as part of the record (of a good idea, badly implemented). --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:10, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. Debresser (talk) 12:23, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.