Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AirportExpert (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. — xaosflux  Talk 19:40, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AirportExpert

 * – (View MfD)

Abandoned RfA. Created in good faith but not edited in a year. This is a follow-up from the previous nomination; specifically I have notified AirportExpert and would like him to have a say this time round. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment -- It would have been far better; if you chatted with him over his t/p and then came over here (esp. that you were the nominator of the first MfD). Ought to be userified, shall AExpert not consent to the deletion but non-bothered, even if it stays. &#x222F; WBG converse 13:47, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I seem to recall asking him (but I could be wrong) about running it; it's good faith and isn't a NOTNOW. All things are possible. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep or Userfy or Mark historical - No need to delete. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:50, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Lack of meaningful rationale. And, I don't wish to see a third MfD from the same user. &#x222F; WBG converse 13:34, 3 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.