Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/JoshBlitz

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. RfAs are rarely deleted. Invalidating someone's good faith candidacy, however misguided it may be, by deleting it is definitely not a practice we should be encouraging. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 14:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/JoshBlitz


Doesn't appear to be a legitimate RfA, or was never transcluded correctly (if it had been, I'd anticipate a WP:SNOW close on this) Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   10:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - I think this might have won a -100 contest. User in question appears (in the page) to be making an end run around advice given to him by multiple different editors in good standing by making a bid for Adminship.  As the user admits, they've submitted articles for AfC and none have been accepted (in fact I'm one who declined the best work in The Pirates of the Carribean (TPotC) cronology).  This would never pass muster at AfC, though if the author wants to submit their premature AfC and get the black mark of TOSOON they can do that. Hasteur (talk) 13:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.