Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/varuag doos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete (housekeeping) without prejudice for recreation at any time by a good faith editor. — xaosflux  Talk  03:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/varuag doos
This orphaned RFA was never even listed on the front RFA page. Even if it had run the course, it would have been SNOWed. Scob e ll302 06:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am usually a proponent of archiving requests, but since this one was improperly formatted and never commented on by voters, I see no problem in deleting it. - Mgm|(talk) 10:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as there are no comments / !votes. The nomination wasn't even completed!  Srose   (talk)  17:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.