Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/أبو السعد 22

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. WP:SNOW Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/أبو السعد 22

 * – (View MfD)

Ridiculous RfB attempt by a user who has since been indefinitely blocked at ANI. Wasn't sure if I could still G2 this since they claimed directly it was not a test page. Anyway, needs to go. Crossroads -talk- 16:04, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't have enough working knowledge of the request for beuraucratship process to provide a proper vote on this. I do feel however its the start of a slippery slope to delete a request like this for being "ridiculous". Can you provide specific policy that was violated? This will help take out the subjective element and might help for my and other editors edification. Sulfurboy (talk) 16:22, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note the slippery slope fallacy and that we are not a bureaucracy (which makes the term "bureaucrat" kind of funny) . We can use common sense knowing that an indefinitely blocked user can't become a bureaucrat, hence their incomplete self-nomination is garbage. Crossroads -talk- 16:57, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete, obviously – couldn't this be speedy deleted as housekeeping? --bonadea contributions talk 16:58, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete (and I would be happy with speedying it, though I won't do it myself). The policy reasons that we keep records of unsuccessful, even badly unsuccessful, RfAs and RfBs don't apply to this situation. Also, we shouldn't create a precedent that any vandal can create a permanent undeleteable monument to himself merely by putting the RfA or RfB header on top of the page. Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:19, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Newyorkbrad and others. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.