Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biruitorul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was wrong process. The RfC indeed looks baseless, but the normal speedy deletion for such pages will kick in quicker than this MfD could anyway. Page will be deleted if it hasn't become a properly formatted, substantiated and certified RfC within 48 hours after creation of the page (i.e., almost certainly, the way it looks now.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Biruitorul
This RfC is absurd, baseless (initiator claimed I started 50 AfD discussions in two days, when I started just 3 or so), out of process (see here - few of the steps outlined were followed, and a second user did not certify), and tarnishes my good name. I'd like it to be deleted. -- Biruitorul Talk 00:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Participants in an RfC should not be arranging deletion of that RfC. There may  or may not be incorrect statements there, but there is nothing offensive.  If there is no problem revealed then Biruitorul should be exonerated by the process. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:15, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * "Any RfC not accompanied by evidence showing that two users tried and failed to resolve the same dispute may be deleted after 48 hours" - about 40 hours remain, and this will be subject to deletion anyway, but given the utterly baseless nature of the complaint (and the fact that one doesn't simply go to RfC at the first hint of a dispute), one may as well do it sooner. - Biruitorul Talk 04:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The 48 hours time limit will beat the time needed for a MfD. Timlight has failed to discuss this first on a talk page, so has not followed the correct procedure.   So I expect the result will be RfC process delete, unless the discussion on the page turns out to be fruitful.  So far no misbehavior on the part of Biruitorul has been revealed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:19, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.