Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Categorization


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. After Midnight 0001 03:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Categorization
RFC works by subject area, not by technical aspect of Wikipedia. It would be impractical and confusing, and encourage crossposting, to have RFCs for templates, categories, and so forth.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  09:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Most disputed categories should fall under one of the existing subject areas. The particular listed category does. –Pomte 21:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * See also . —Centrx→talk &bull; 17:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - the project is to write an encyclopedia, therefore articles are more important than categories, templates or anything else. We have more process to improve articles to reflect this. We don't require more process for categories. Addhoc 23:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.