Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RFCmedia/manual


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep--Aervanath (talk) 12:51, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Requests for comment/RFCmedia/manual
incomprehensible Toddst1 (talk) 09:54, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as vandal. Or restore initial redirect as well. Speedily. Collect (talk) 11:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above discussion. I wonder why this didn't get speedy deleted right away too, unlike the talk page. Versus22 talk 22:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep This is how RFCs are manually listed without using the bot/template system. It should just remain blank, as there are no current manual entries. -- Ned Scott 03:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It is in active use, and is normally blank, it gets used several times per month. But what is the meaning of the content? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:13, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.