Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RfA

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. North America1000 23:30, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RfA


It's finished now. Can we delete it as it says they scrapped it  Varun FEB2003   I am Offline 12:41, 26 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep, no need to delete this page. Also, it's linked to from several places and has messages on its talk page. Graham 87 07:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep; we do not delete old proposals. Consider moving it to Requests for comment/RfA (October 2012).  Even if the single substantial author were to request deletion, it should be declined due to the extended substance on its talk page.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:17, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep No reason to delete, it seems. If "it's old" were reason for deleting something on Wikipedia...... :) BTW pinging page creator, who does not look to have been notified. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 14:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.