Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Slrubenstein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 09:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Slrubenstein

 * See also: Votes for deletion/Requests for comment Slrubenstein

Uncertified RFC filed by a banned user, never met certification criteria, should be deleted per RFC policy.  MBisanz  talk 20:23, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as an uncertified RfC. I would speedy it except that this could become needlessly controversial in light of the prior VfD with a Keep result&mdash;but that decision was reached when the page was apparently being used as evidence in an arbitration case, and is hardly relevant today given that that case closed three years ago. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as an uncertified RfC. --Elonka 01:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * speedy delete- remove like other uncertified RfCs, that it was made by a now banned user makes the RfC even less useful for reference purposes. Sticky Parkin 02:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.