Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Verklempt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete per RFC policy - this page was not certified by two users after 48 hours, hence it goes.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  11:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Verklempt
RFC was not created according to established policy for user RFCs. Because of this, the RFC has never appeared on the user RFC candidate list, and consequently has not been processed according to policy.Verklempt 23:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: This probably does need to be deleted, but you should let the person who created the page know of this nomination. Newyorkbrad 16:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Couldn't someone just move this to the proper forum? -MrFizyx 21:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - It is not fair to Verklempt to leave an improperly posted RfC since only a select group of editors had the opportunity to comment at the RfC. I posted a note on User:Max rspct's talk page and on Requests for comment talk page. Unless they provide some reason to keep the page, it should be deleted. --  Jreferee  (Talk) 07:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.