Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Rouge admin (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep per WP:ROUGE.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  16:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Rouge admin
How does a page full of mockery and drivel belong in wikipedia official policy space. If it is an inside joke between a handful of users, then it belongs in user space. &mdash;Kymacpherson 14:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, nom doesn't understand the impact of this page. Plus, the last MfD at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Rouge admin got a unanimous keep.  Mango juice talk 14:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, makes an important point in a humorous fashion. TomTheHand 15:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy KeepJames, La gloria è a dio 16:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Just more-a-less attacking sysops or editors who do not agree with what they say. Telly addict  16:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, established page which serves a usefull purpose for the community. Plus, without this page, I might never have found The Wrong Version. --After Midnight 0001 16:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.