Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms/embankment

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Move to Commons. Feel free to move whenever. I don't have Import access over there so I don't think I can do it. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 10:13, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms/embankment


Orphaned; appears to be abandoned. The BSicon catalogue is now on Commons, and this largely duplicates sections of those pages. Jc86035 (talk) 12:02, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I assume a redirect would help with navigation to Commons? VQuakr (talk) 07:15, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Move to Commons, as noted with Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms/embankment. This should have been done along with all the other catalog pages. With reference to the "duplication" issue, it is often helpful to have all the icons in these broad sub-categories available in one place. Useddenim (talk) 11:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Move what exactly? The pictograms are already on Commons. You wouldn't be able to put the tables on Commons. That isn't what Commons is for. It is for multimedia in the file namespace. Not wikitables that can't be quickly used on other projects. --Majora (talk) 02:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Well color me shocked. Today I learned that those things exist on Commons. Seems incredibly useless on so many levels but there you go. --Majora (talk) 03:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.