Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sajid Sadi

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ‑Scottywong | [yak] || 16:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sajid Sadi

 * – (View MfD)

This is an article and not a project page. I have deliberately chosen to list this as MfD and not as WP:RM because a slightly different versionupdated already exists in mainspace Draftsupdated, see Draft talk:Sajid Sadiupdated for more information. Rummskartoffel (talk) 12:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC); edited 14:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC) because Sajid Sadi Bio was moved to Draft:Sajid Sadi
 * Keep and Merge to draft. It would appear that this was at some time split from the version now at Draft:Sajid Sadi. f so, a history merge should be performed. If not, a merge and redirect should be done to capture any valid info in this version that is not in the draft. Whether the draft can be devlopped to a valid article is not up for discussion here at this time. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * As far as I can tell, there really isn't anything there to merge . If I haven't missed anything, the only things WP:Sajid Sadi has that Draft:Sajid Sadi doesn't are a few duplicated references (note that the draftspace version does have all same references, just not duplicated) as well as some stuff at the top that isn't part of the article anyway. Note also that all of the references that are only bare links in WP:Sajid Sadi have titles in the draftspace version, which leads me to believe the draftspace version is essentially just a further developed version of WP:Sajid Sadi, making WP:Sajid Sadi completely redundant in my eyes. Rummskartoffel (talk) 01:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comparison, . Then there probably is no need for a content merge, but a history merge to preserve attribution should be done. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 02:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - We don't need extra copies of drafts in extra address spaces. Author seems to be trying to flood the system with copies.  Robert McClenon (talk) 07:19, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * To be clear,, I am proposing a single copy after a history merge, not retaining an extra copy. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete both the major contributors to the Wikipedia namespace version have been banned for COI, freelance (paid) editing, socks and other stuff. The one currently in draft was started by the freelancer. Best to WP:TNT and let someone unrelated to Sadi's business take a shot at it., if you want to keep it around so you can work on it, then I support the histmerge and then we need to add connected contributor tags. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.