Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sections for deletion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. No need to ponder the existence or not of a non-existent process page created in a peculiar manner. -Splash talk 00:55, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Sections for deletion
Is Sections for deletion useful in Wikipedia? If not, then this probably be deleted. Robin Williams 22:53, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedily if possible. This was just created by Robot32 because there were sections of an article he wanted to have deleted. First he added AfD templates to them, which I removed, explaining that AfD is for whole articles, not sections. I also explained that the usual thing to do if a section of an article is questionable is to take it to the talk page of the article in question. --Angr ( tɔk ) 23:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * comment this was originally at afd then moved here, so theres a redirect from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Sections for deletion to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sections for deletion that probably will need deleting sometime. BL   kiss the lizard  23:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC) already gone.
 * cant we speedy delete a process page for a process that was never proposed anywhere? also sfd is already used as a name. BL   kiss the lizard  23:56, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.