Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Self-revert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete and redirect, there is really no useful-to-Help:Reverting content to merge anyways.  Daniel.Bryant  08:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Self-revert
Personal essay in project space on a term it is readily self-apparent ("A self-revert to a Wikipedia page is a reversion you do yourself...") and a non-topic. FeloniousMonk 23:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Too deep for me. &#0149;Jim 62 sch&#0149;  23:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Dicdef for minor term in plain English. KillerChihuahua?!? 00:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Radiant, that would actually be helpful. KillerChihuahua?!? 11:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom & KC. It's just a bit too obvious.  Guettarda 01:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Help:Reverting.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  10:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with m:Help:Reverting. There's information here that isn't there, although I agree that this isn't a major enough topic to have its own project page. --ais523 11:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per User:ais523. --Uncle Ed 13:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not relevant here, most of the info there can be found in Help:Reverting. Telly   addict Editor review! 13:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Make into Redirect per Radiant!. I think a redirect within Wikipedia would be better than one which went to Meta-Wiki. Sam Blacketer 16:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree that the resulting redirect should be local. However, the local Help:Reverting is just a copy of the Meta page, and so the Meta page should be edited with the info that's here and not there. --ais523 11:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Radiant!. ConDem Talk 04:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Help:Reverting this isn't covered there, nor is it's impact on 3RR violations detailed. - WeniWidiWiki 06:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete useless. Storm05 15:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete yes, it is a dicdef, so it belongs in WP:G. And I've added it -- see Glossary. Feel free to expand the definition if you like. Grace notes T  &#167; 23:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC) (P.S. count this as a redirect, by the way) 23:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Radiant. John Reaves (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.