Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Shotguns for a Better Tomorrow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy delete as author request. — xaosflux  Talk  02:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Shotguns for a Better Tomorrow
Page advocating the creation of anarchy and the removal of key Wikipedia policies. If taken at face value, the page may also be advocating violence. While this page may have been created as a joke, the humor is not clear enough for a page of this type to continue to exist. Jester 18:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Object. User is the sockpuppet of an administrator (and humor-impaired, to boot). Mackensen (talk) 18:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Mark it as clear humor and/or userfy it? It's a bit nonsensical and in questionable taste, but it's okay for a userspace, if marked as humor. --  stillnotelf   is invisible  18:37, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * It is perhaps a commentary on recent developments that this isn't obviously meta-humor. Mackensen (talk) 18:38, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * It's likely to be obvious to anyone voting here (including myself), but I'm just trying to think of the confused new people... -- stillnotelf   is invisible  21:48, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and Reformat, or Keep and Construct, depending on the outcome. Comment and Bold.  Bastique &#09660; parler voir 18:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Not funny enough for BJAODN.  And what if the project succeeds at its seventh project:  "(provisionally) Immanentize the Eschaton" ?  That would interfere with the construction of this free online encyclopedia.  Barno 18:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Tell the wikitruth! Censor! --Tony Sidaway 19:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above Gretnagod 19:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Bastique &#09660; parler voir 19:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Like Jimbo says "DON'T MESS WITH ME, I HAVE AN ENCYCLOPEDIA!!1!!!!!"--Tony Sidaway 19:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Userify. Not useful, and not that funny.  Would fit perfectly in userspace.  --Hughcharlesparker 20:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- User:Malber (talk • contribs) 20:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, or Move to Meta if deletion wins out, perhaps with some sort of mirror on Wikipedia, if possible.-- The  i  kiro  id  (talk) (Help Me Improve) 20:38, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete because the humor sucks --mboverload @ 00:15, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Just because you don't get it is no excuse for incivility. Mackensen (talk) 02:19, 24 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.