Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Signpost/Single/2015-02-11

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Redirect to Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2015-02-11. Nakon 03:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Signpost/Single/2015-02-11


This is a duplicate of Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2015-02-11 which is the correctly titled page. Liz Read! Talk! 21:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep even if this is the wrong name, it seems to be the one that is linked from everywhere. The other that you says is the correct title, is almost unlinked and so should get the chop. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Question How about simply redirecting this page to the correct one? Or would that mess up transclusions? --Pine✉ 22:28, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Pine, a redirect would work. There are a couple other pages with this titling for early 2015 and you have commented on another MFD for one.
 * As there are hundreds of single page issues of the Signpost that have either the format of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/Date (for 2010-2015) or Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Date/SPV (for 2005-2009), I would strongly discourage eliminating a page in either of those titling formats over Wikipedia:Signpost/Single/Date. It is ridiculous that the Wikipedia is repeated (Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost) but I have now categorized thousands of these pages and I would hope that there would be consistency here. Thanks for the suggestion Pine. Liz  Read! Talk! 23:15, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Support replacing page with redirect per above. --<b style="color:#01796F;">Pine</b><sup style="color:#01796F;">✉ 00:20, 15 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2015-02-11: page is linked too much to delete, but there's no need to duplicate content. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 11:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.