Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sir Steven Clark PhD

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Routine closure This seems to have been moved elsewhere, so I'm closing this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Sir Steven Clark PhD


Wrong namespace - seems to be article about a living person but I also strongly suspect the it is a hoax because the sources don't support the content. Jaellee (talk) 23:22, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Don't understand, what do you mean for me to modify or change? I read through the reference and could not find any violations. Please explain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwilliams99 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 7 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Articles should be created in the article namespace, e.g. without "Wikipedia:" prefix. The Wikipedia namespace is a namespace consisting of pages with information or discussion about Wikipedia. You might read Namespace which explains this in more detail. Sir Steven Clark PhD is not a page with information or discussion about Wikipedia so it doesn't belong in the Wikipedia namespace. Steven Clark would be a better name (see Naming conventions (people)) but as there are more than one notable Steven Clarks, you'd have disambiguate further. --Jaellee (talk) 00:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete 1) wrong namespace 2) nn (doesn't seem to meet Notability (people)) (btw the page now redirects to Steve Clark which is still in the wrong namespace and nn)--William Thweatt TalkContribs 01:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Leaving aside the incorrect namespace, the sources don't check out, there's no independent sources to back any of it up, and much of this content would be (if factual) a massive violation of WP:BLP, going into inappropriate detail about non-encyclopedic personal information.   All the related pages should be deleted as well.--Arxiloxos (talk) 04:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.