Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Six Pillars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete —  xaosflux  Talk  03:00, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Six Pillars
Incorrect nomination, moving here to correct. Page was originally placed up for PROD, which, as I understand, does not apply to pages outside of article space. Information from original PROD as follows: ''user experiment. confusing. no collaboration/consensus. redundant.'' Original PROD nominator:Quiddity. My personal vote: Delete. み使い Mitsukai 12:32, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Ter e nce Ong 13:37, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If creator wishes to make a policy proposal, let him/her do so. As it is, this gives the appearence of modifying core policy, which could be very confusing. Xoloz 15:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy. Many interesting points, some probably in keeping with consensus, some needing discussion. Not WP policy. Not linked to from anywhere. But could be used by creator as a Wikipedia essay or to contribute to policy discussions on more consensus-driven pages, so don't just delete. By the way, has anyone discussed this with the page creator? Martinp 16:28, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: According to the creator's userpage, he/she closed the account earlier today.  No reason given.  Rossami (talk) 18:56, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. as original nominator. --Quiddity 19:18, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article is not a consensus policy but its author(s) appear to want it to be. The Wikipedia community has spent plenty of effort creating introductions to the site, with far more input, and many of these introductions have been tagged with consensus.  This article, in trying to undermine the existing and widely agreed-upon articles, is both redundant and disrespectful to the theory of review by large numbers of people, upon which the concept of a Wiki is based. DougOfDoom   talk  02:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a fork of Five pillars. Amendments to the five pillars can be proposed on its talk page. -- Tantalum T  e  lluride  01:31, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Five Pillars of our Wikipedia is enough.-- 陈 鼎  翔    贡献  Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 04:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Might be useful as a redirect to the five pillars. --  stillnotelf   is invisible  19:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.